|
Trust and the
Virtual Organization
Handy, C.
(1995). Trust and the Virtual Organization. Harvard
Business Review,
As virtuality becomes more common,
trust can falter, so organizations must take measures to make sure
that this does not occur.
This article focuses on the
necessary element of trust and its vital role in the virtual
organization. As virtuality becomes more common, trust can
falter, so organizations must take measures to make sure that this
does not occur.
It begins by discussing how
virtuality is replacing physical places, causing institutions to be
known as concepts and activities instead of buildings.
However, the article points out that the idea of an activity without
a home in the form of a building and where work is based on
information as the raw material is not new. A good example of
this is a network of salespeople who also work out of sight but not
out of touch. The Open University of Britain, which is the
largest business school in Europe, has created a virtual summer
school program in which students and faculty never meet in a formal
setting. This also exemplifies how a concept without a place
has engulfed such institutions.
In organizations, projects are
assembled which may include people from both inside and outside the
parent organization itself. However, often such projects exist
only as activities because they do not have a certain place to call
their own. And this will be the trend into the future.
The author states, "the office of the future will be more like
a clubhouse; a place for meeting, eating, and greeting, with rooms
reserved for activities, not for particular people". This
will be a big change in the minds of many because they will have to
accept that as virtuality becomes more of a common place, work will
be a matter of what you do, not where you go. And this can be
difficult to accept because many of us identify a sense of place
with a sense of purpose.
It will become more common for us to
be spending time in virtual space. What this means is that we
will have to get used to "working with and managing those whom
we do not see, except on rare and prearranged occasions".
Such occasions include meetings, which will also become few and far
between. However the key to making this virtuality work is
trust, and this may be the hard part.
Handy offers seven rules for trust
that we should keep in mind, but are also instinctive. First,
trust is not blind. We don't tend to trust others that we
don't know well, don't know much about and who don't have commitment
to similar goals. It can be difficult to know more than 50
people really well. Because of this, large organizations, in
order to be compatible with this idea and for trust to be possible,
need to create smaller groupings of employees.
Secondly, trust needs boundaries. Essentially, a trust without
boundaries is unrealistic. Organizations display trust more as
confidence in someone's ability or commitment to a goal. When
this happens, more freedom within these boundaries can exist and
people can be left to achieve these goals on their own.
Trust demands learning. In order to portray constancy in an
organization, it must also be able to change when times and
customers demand it and keep on top of such change. This
requires a strong learning culture to enable employees to adapt to
new technologies and situations.
Trust is tough. No one can be right about judgments of
character 100% of the time. But when trust is lost, not
because of ill intentions but because someone can't be relied on or
doesn't come through as expected, then they must go. "Trust
must be ruthless".
Trust needs bonding. While smaller individual units are
responsible for certain results that build the whole of the
organization, both of these parts must have goals that bond them
together for the organization to work.
Trust needs touch. "Paradoxically, the more virtual the
organization becomes, the more its people need to meet in person,
because a shared commitment still requires personal contact to make
it real". If people can recognize each other in meetings
and teleconferences as ones they know and recognize, then such
meetings can be more productive and can reinforce corporate goals
and strategies.
Finally, trust requires leaders- a multiplicity of leaders whom
individuals trust for their commitment towards a common goal.
The dilemma for the organization is
what motivates people in the virtual organization to put so much
into it, although some person, unknown to them, may own it.
One answer to this involves a trust that secures a sense of
mutuality and reciprocal loyalty in which the laborers are turned
into members. Members have rights and responsibilities which
include a share in how the community they belong to is run.
This can greatly impact an organization because "people who
think of themselves as members have more of an interest in the
future of the business and its growth than those who are only its
hired help". This concept of membership can further
enhance trust within an organization because "when made real,
it would replace the sense of belonging to a place with a sense of
belonging to a community even if that community is a virtual
one". Such a sense of belonging is also a necessary ingredient
for commitment to an organization. This is well illustrated
through families whose sense of belonging, commitment and mutual
trust bind them as a community.
Economies based on information,
ideas and intelligence will add value to societies by providing
alternatives to material growth and environmental erosion.
This could result in promoting a gentler and quieter world with
fewer people commuting from place to place. Growth would be
based in certain sectors that are focused on the mind rather then
the body. But in order for this type of economy to flourish,
all people need to be able to take part. We need to teach and
develop skills in everyone, in the overall workforce so we are
making use of a much greater percentage of it and not just focusing
on core members of organizations.
This article vividly illustrates how
virtuality is becoming more common, but involves many ideas that we
are actually very familiar with. What is necessary in
organizations for virtuality to work is trust among its members and
trust involves many things. However, trust can be more easily
overlooked in virtual organizations causing dilemmas for managers
and society and we need to make sure that this does not happen.
Back to Aslan
News
|